About Us

KEY WORDS

Cylindricity deviation, measurement strategy, linear least squares method (LLS), coordinate measuring machine (CMM).

ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper is to compare the quantitative parameters of methods used for the evaluation of the cylindricity deviation. Data is measured by the contact method using three different strategies for cylindricity measurement on the coordinate measurement machine (CMM) Contura G2, Carl Zeiss. For particular measurement strategies, the data is evaluated by Calypso 5.0 software (CMM) Contura G2 and Matlab/Octave software. In order to compare the collected data, we use the parameters of possible axes positions of two coaxial cylinders and their least radial distance. In the last part of this paper, there is the discussion regarding obtained parameters of evaluating methods.

CITATION INFORMATION

Acta Mechanica Slovaca. Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 94 – 97, ISSN 1335-2393

DOWNLOAD

  Method Comparison of the Evaluation of the Cylindricity Deviation Measured by Different Measurement Strategies

REFERENCES

[1] Flag D.: CMM measurement strategies. ISSN 1368-6550 NPL United Kingdom 2001.

[2] Henzold G.: Geometrical Dimensioning and Tolerancing for Design, Manufacturing and Inspection. Elsevier Ltd. 2006
[3] ISO 12180-2:1999: Geometrical product specification (GPS) Cylindricity - Part 2: Specification operators.- Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH, 1999, 15 pp.
[4] Adamczak S.: Metrologia w budowie maszyn. Warszawa, Wydawnictwa Naukowo- techniczne, 2004,300 s. ISBN 978-83-204-3526-9
[5] Majstrovič V., Hodolič J.: Numerički upravljane merne mašine. Novi Sad, Offset print, 1998, 183 s. ISBN 86-499-0091-7
[6] Chudý V., Palenčár R., Kureková E., Halaj M.: Meranie technických veličín. Vyd. STU, 1998 ISBN 80-227-1171-3
[7] Ákos A. Model of electronic moire equipment. Inf. Control. Syst. 2010;9:36–68.
[8] Adamczak S., Janecki D., Makiela W., Stepieň K.: Quantitative comparison of cylindricity profiles measured with different methods using legendre-fourier coefficients Metrol.Meas.Syst. Vol.XVII (2010), No.3.pp.397-404
[9] Довица М., Буша Я., Паленчар Р., Дюриш С., Шоош Л., Врба И., Шковранек Т., Келеменова Т.: Сравнение методов анализа отклонений круглости. Измерительная техника. 2013, №9, С. 25-27.(in Russian)

Latest Issue

ams 2 2016

Download

Guests Online

We have 20 guests and no members online